Adam Schiff’s Dilemma

One of the problems with trying to keep your lies straight is often you find yourself with a dilemma.

And that’s exactly where Shifty Adam Schiff finds himself right now.

Adam has a bit of a dilemma.

You see, before today’s Shampeachment began, Schiff announced that any Committee member who dares name the whistleblower coup-plotter would find himself or herself facing an ethics investigation.

Ooooooh!!!  Totally scary, right?!

But then, during his Impeachment Porn hearing, when Congressman Jim Jordan pointed out that the only member of the committee who knows the name of this whistleblower coup-plotter is Adam Schiff, Adam actually claimed he did not know the whistleblower’s coup-plotter’s name.


See the problem?

Adam Schiff’s Dilemma

Adam has a dilemma here.

Sure, it isn’t on the level of Sophie’s Choice or anything.

But if he wants to follow through with his ethics threat, he has to acknowledge that he knows the name of the whistleblower coup-plotter.  I mean, how else would he know if a member of the Committee names the guy, right?

But now he’s on record stating he does not know the guy’s name.


Sucks to be Adam.

Seriously, this guy is a cartoon character.

Now Available!

Dianny’s latest ebook, RANT: Derangement & Resistance in MAGA Country, is now available for purchase. You can find it at Amazon, Apple iBooksBarnes & Noble Nook Store, and at Smashwords for only $4.99!

Hit the Tip Jar!

Every dollar makes a difference!  Hit the DONATE button in the side bar.  Or, set up a recurring monthly contribution by choosing SUBSCRIBE.

Please White List Patriot Retort

Not everyone can afford to make a donation.  But you can still help keep this site solvent by white listing in your ad blocker. Ads help pay for this site and ad-blockers hurt that effort.  I made sure that the ads that appear here will not obstruct or interfere with your enjoyment of the content.  So please add to your white list.

8 thoughts on “Adam Schiff’s Dilemma

  • November 13, 2019 at 3:46 pm

    posted my response on this clusterflock on previous post, sorry.

    • November 13, 2019 at 4:14 pm

      You can repost it here if you want and I’ll delete it from the other post.

  • November 13, 2019 at 5:53 pm

    Think Shithead Schiff is starting to shit his pants?

  • November 13, 2019 at 6:42 pm

    What a joke, Only thing I’m not laughing about the Sciffster. Just at his lowness.

  • November 14, 2019 at 2:06 am

    Hmmmmm! That is called, sitting on the horns of a dilemma!

  • November 14, 2019 at 8:28 am

    First thing I thought when I heard this is how funny it’s going to be when Jim Jordan says the name of he who shall not be named in Friday’s hearing. Is dumbschiff going to accuse Jordan of outing the “whistleblower”? If so he admits he lied on Wednesday when he said he does not know who this person is. If he stays silent then the name comes out in public and there’s nothing dumbschiff can do about it. Hysterical.

  • November 14, 2019 at 12:13 pm

    eric ciaramella. Say it loud. Say it proud. eric ciaramella

    What’s it tell you that even Mark Levin whom I respect did NOT say eric ciaramella on Fox Hannity? Hes been saying it on his radio show.

    Could Fox had told him no job no gigs if spoken. Sellout. Sad.

  • November 14, 2019 at 5:04 pm

    Shiffstain’s ‘oopsie’ moment pales in comparison to Quigley’s comment that hearsay is actually better than fact when it comes to real evidence.
    My first thought was OMG! Did you get your brains in that little packet that comes in a box of Crackerjacks as a prize?

Comments are closed.