If you haven’t seen it yet, watch this segment between Mark Levin and Sean Hannity. Levin makes one salient point about this whole FISAGate that can’t be understated. In short, all roads lead to Obama:
Now, I don’t want to toot my own horn.
Okay, yeah, I do.
But on November 6, 2016 after James Comey once again exonerated Hillary Clinton after reopening the email investigation, I wrote a column titled This isn’t about protecting Hillary.
Trust me. Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch, the Democrat Party leadership — these people do not like Hillary Clinton.
In fact, I’d venture to say they despise her.
And her husband.
And her buck-toothed bitch of a daughter.
Oh, and her little dog too!
They’re not protecting Hillary.
As far as they’re concerned, Hillary can rot in prison.
No. They wouldn’t go to all this trouble to utterly corrupt our entire criminal justice system just for one old, decrepit, corrupt hag they hate with a passion.
You don’t go to these lengths to protect someone like that.
This isn’t about protecting Hillary.
This is about protecting Barack Hussein Obama.
You know it.
I know it.
And James Comey knows it too.
Now, I’m not Nostradamus.
Anybody who lived through the eight years Barack Obama was president could have told you this was the case.
I went on:
Tell me honestly. Is it hard to imagine Hillary telling Obama, “If I go down, you go down?”
Of course not.
I’d bet money on it.
In fact, I think Bill’s little tarmac pow-wow with Loretta Lynch was a friendly reminder. If Hillary is indicted, Obama will go down faster than Monica.
We all know the Clintons.
We know how they operate.
The idea of Mutually Assured Destruction is not at all outside the realm of possibility.
As far as the Clintons go, MAD is SOP.
On November 4, 2016, Fox News reported that a number of top Democrats were trying to get James Comey fired over reopening the Clinton investigation.
And among them was Obama’s BFF and chief advisor Valerie Jarrett.
I pointed out in my column:
Jarrett hates Clinton.
You think Valerie Jarrett would go to all that trouble to protect a woman she despises?
Not a chance.
There is only one person Valerie Jarrett would protect like that.
I knew back then that all roads lead to Obama.
There is absolutely no way Barack Obama would have been ignorant of this FISA Kabuki.
Why else would the Democrats be this upset over our learning of the FISA abuses committed by Obama’s DOJ and FBI?
There is only one person the Democrat Party would go to such lengths to protect.
And it sure isn’t James Comey or Hillary Clinton.
No. All roads lead to Obama.
If I had to guess, I’d say that what we learned from the Nunes memo barely scratches the surface of the corruption Obama unleashed at the FBI and DOJ.
As Matthew Vadum points out today at Front Page Magazine, the Left is having a full-on meltdown over this memo.
The extended freakout came after the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence publicly unveiled a newly declassified four-page report detailing intelligence surveillance abuses perpetrated by the Obama administration during the past election cycle. As expected, the document confirmed more or less all the terrible things we’ve been hearing about the disgraced Federal Bureau of Investigation and its parent agency, the U.S. Department of Justice.
One of the more outrageous examples of hyperbole came from Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who absurdly claimed “the release of this memo is really reminiscent of the darkest days of the McCarthy era.”
As left-wingers see things, when governmental transparency exposes Republican wrongdoing, it is noble, patriotic, and just. When it exposes Democrat wrongdoing, it is terrorism and treason.
The memo itself is devastating. It shows how corrupt the swamp-dwellers in the nation’s capital are. No wonder Democrats shrieked so loudly in protest of the memo’s release: it indicts them.
Do you really think Democrats would be shrieking this loudly just to protect the reputation of the FBI?
Neither do I.
Remember what the hapless Maxine Waters inadvertently admitted back in February of 2013 when appearing with Roland Martin on TV One’s “Washington Watch?”
“Well, you know, I don’t know. And I think some people are missing something here. The president has put in place an organization that contains the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. That’s going to be very, very powerful. That database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before.”
The Democrats in Congress knew the extent of Barack Obama’s reach.
And they thought it was a good thing.
Now that Obama’s politicization of the surveillance state is being exposed, these rats are shrieking about “treason” and “Russian bots.”
They wouldn’t go to all this trouble just to protect Hillary Clinton or the “reputation of the FBI.”
No. Not a chance.
There is far more to it than just this FISA warrant against Carter Page.
In fact, I’m thinking that Obama’s corruption of the FBI and DOJ didn’t start in 2016.
And it didn’t start with Donald Trump.
I also think that Adam Schiff and the other rat bastards in the Democrat Party know just how bad it is.
Levin is right. The Democrats would never get this hysterical in order to protect “law enforcement.” They don’t give a damn about law enforcement.
No. All roads lead to Obama.
He is the only person they would go to these lengths to protect.
And the louder the Democrats shriek, the more hysterical their accusations become, the more convinced I am that Barack Hussein Obama is in this up to his eyeballs.
Hit the Tip Jar!
Your contributions help keep PatriotRetort.com an ad-free site. Hit the DONATE button in the side bar. Or, set up a recurring monthly contribution by choosing SUBSCRIBE. Even a few bucks can make a world of difference!