I just finished screen printing a couple of Hope ‘n Change Cartoons’ “Aloha Snackbar” T-shirts for a customer and came out here to my office to check Breitbart. A headline caught my eye:
When I finished laughing my ass off, I clicked the link and read the brief piece wondering just how stupid Hillary Clinton thinks Americans are.
Pretty stupid, apparently.
Then I got to the last quote:
She suggested that Americans would be pleased, if she was elected president and proved herself.
“I take it seriously,” she said. “And I’m going to work my heart out in this campaign and as president to produce results for people.”
You know the old saying, “You can tell a tree by its fruits?”
What has Hillary Clinton done in her lengthy career to give anybody the impression she will “produce results for people?”
I mean other than Haiti.
The most devastating earthquake in the region. Thousands dead. Many more thousands homeless.
The Clinton Foundation went in there and found a way to get fabulously rich off of the tragedy. Not only for themselves, but for their wealthy donors.
Did Hillary “produce results for the people” of Haiti?
No. She just profited off of their misery.
Who in his right mind would believe that this greedy, corrupt, opportunistic hag is going to do better as President?
Does anybody with half a brain actually believe that a woman with absolutely zero understanding of how jobs are created or an economy works is going to do anything as President to “produce results for the people?”
Hillary will do for America exactly what she did for Haiti.
Hillary is also quoted in this brief story defending her “trustworthiness.”
If Hillary Clinton is just a few notches below Mother Teresa when it comes to honor, honesty, trustworthiness and charity, she could actually point to something concrete to prove it. So does she? Does she give examples of just how trustworthy she is?
She points out how popular she was in New York back when she was a Senator, and how in 2012 her approval rating was 66% nationally.
“Were 67 percent of the people in New York wrong? Were 66 percent of the American public wrong?” she asked.
Just a couple weeks ago, I posted about Gallup’s recent polling of Hillary showing she now has the lowest approval rating of her entire public career: 38%.
I don’t know, Hillary. To answer your question “were 66 percent of the American public wrong?” Clearly 28% of those 66% thought they were wrong.
That’s what happens when we get a belly full of your lies, your criminal behavior, your incompetence and greed.
This is how bad it is for Hillary. In order to “prove” she’s trustworthy, she has to go in the Wayback Machine to 2012 and point to a favorable rating that all but evaporated in the intervening years.
This is like an over-the-hill guy with a beer belly and bad knees demanding to be made quarterback of the New York Giants because back in the day, he was a really popular quarterback in high school. Not a good quarterback, mind you. But a really popular one.
The one and only example Hillary can cite as “proving” she can be trusted is that Barack Obama trusted her enough to make her Secretary of State.
We should trust her because the guy who trusts the Ayatollah trusted her?
Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Hit the tip jar!
Please consider making a contribution to PatriotRetort.com. Hit DONATE button in the side bar. Even a few bucks can make a world of difference!