Potty-Mouth Barbie


I think we’ve nailed down what the Democrat Party’s 2018 strategy is.


Well, of course.

After all, when we go low, they go f*cking high.

Potty-mouth Tom Perez started the trend toward the gutter and apparently Kirsten Gillibrand couldn’t wait to hop on board that train.

Yesterday, speaking at the Personal Democracy F*cking Forum at New York F*cking University, Gillibrand let her potty-mouth fly free.

Despite the fact that President Trump continues to make good on his campaign promises, f*cking Kirsten f*cking Gillibrand said this:

Has he kept any of these promises? No. F*ck no!

Can you believe this potty-mouth crank is a member of the United States Senate?

She sure is taking that whole “World’s Most Deliberative Body” thing to heart, isn’t she?

But she wasn’t done.

Fundamentally, if we are not helping people, we should go the f*ck home.

I’m good with the second part, Kirsten.

Please, go the f*ck home.

The role of the US Senate isn’t to help people.

It isn’t a charity, you stupid, potty-mouth bint.

The purpose of the Senate is to ensure that the sovereign states of the United States of America have representation in our Federal Government.

But Kirsten Potty-Mouth Gillibrand doesn’t give a tinker’s fart about the state of New York.

She is there to make sure Planned Parenthood gets funded while refugees and illegals continue to flood into our country.

Oh, and she thinks her job is to convince America that there is a rape epidemic on college campuses and in the military. At the same time she pretends the actual rape epidemic caused by illegals and Muslim migrants doesn’t exist at all.

Potty-mouth Barbie here is setting her sights on a 2020 run for the White House.

But when you consider just how base and vile the Democrat Party has become, she’d be the perfect f*cking choice.

The irony of course is Gillibrand was one of the shrill women claiming that Donald Trump is too course and uncouth to be President of the United States.

But is it Donald Trump who is debasing our political discourse?

Well, to borrow from Potty-Mouth Barbie: No! F*ck no!

That would be Democrats like Potty-Mouth Barbie, Kirsten Gillibrand.

Hat tip the New York Post.

Hit the Tip Jar!

Your contributions help keep PatriotRetort.com an ad-free site. Hit DONATE button or the SUBSCRIBE button in the side bar. Even a few bucks can make a world of difference!

5 thoughts on “Potty-Mouth Barbie

  • June 10, 2017 at 9:00 am

    Dianny, there is a story I read years ago about a famous senator. The senate wanted to vote to give the widow of an admiral some money. This senator gave a speech in which he offered to give one of his pay checks and challenged the other senators to do the same. He pointed out that the purpose of the senate was not charity, no matter how worthy the cause, and that it wasn’t charity when you are spending other people’s money.

    The current Congress does not understand this perspective.

  • June 10, 2017 at 11:53 am

    Dianny, You hit too many excellent points to list!

  • June 10, 2017 at 2:36 pm

    Hi Dianny! Excellent article once again! Don’t you ever get tired of WINNING like that? LOL
    I grew up in a trucking family which also had a lot of Navy men. So I learned how to cuss like a sailor at an early age. However. Soap didn’t taste all that good, so my cussing was done way back up in the woods away from Mama! 20 or so years ago, I found myself in Connecticut with some new friends we had made in trucking. I was totally taken aback how those people up there used the F word as an adjective, adverb, noun, first thing in the a.m., last thing at night. I was thinking at the time “Ya’ll’s soap must have tasted better than that homemade lye soap we had!” LMAO

  • June 10, 2017 at 6:29 pm

    Your comment about “charity” got me to think (your work does make me think a lot — I’m thinking that’s a good thing). We tend to think of charity as giving money, but in the religious sense charity was sharing unbounded love and kindness, as was the meaning of the word in Lincoln’s Second Inauguration Address in 1865, “With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”

    Another interesting part of that short speech is this, “Both parties [he meant North and South]deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.” Seems to me his statement is very relevant to today; with Lincoln’s pardon I offer, “Both parties [Dems & GOP] deprecated war [political and cultural civil war], but one of them [Dems] would make war rather than let the nation survive [after the election], and the other [the GOP] would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came. [as is evident in the media, in DC, on college campuses across the nation, and in the streets of liberal cities]

Comments are closed.