Shouldn’t her “civic responsibility” include testifying under oath?

The Senate Judiciary Committee has announced that they will delay the Kavanaugh vote in order to hold hearings this Monday on these last minute accusations against him.

But as yet, Kavanaugh’s accuser has not agreed to attend.

Chuck Grassley Has Sent Multiple Requests to Brett Kavanaugh's Accuser for Testimony, She Isn't Responding https://t.co/HtjK2liKMG

— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) September 18, 2018

Odd, isn’t it?

She told the Washington Post on Sunday that it was her “civic responsibility” to come forward and tell her story publicly.

But apparently telling her story publicly while under oath isn’t included.

From Pavlich’s piece:

“We still haven’t heard from Dr. Ford, so do they want to have the hearing or not?” Grassley said during an interview with Salem Radio host Hugh Hewitt Tuesday morning. “We have reached out to her in the last 36 hours, three or four times by email and we have not heard from them. It kind of raises the question do they want to come to the public hearing or not? The reason we’re having the public hearing is obviously, well number one, accusations like this deserve consideration and looking into and that’s what the purpose of the hearing is. We wouldn’t be having the hearing if Dr. Ford told the Washington Post and other people publicly she wanted to testify.”

I mean, her attorney – who by the way is the co-chair of a Soros-funded organization opposing Kavanaugh’s nomination – has been all over television.

It seems to me if Ford were really interested in civic responsibility and her attorney interested in justice, they wouldn’t hesitate to have the opportunity to have Ford’s accusations on the record and under oath.

Then again, perhaps her accusation was only meant for the court of public opinion – the one court in the country that never puts anyone under oath.

Judge Kavanaugh quickly offered to return to make testimony under oath about these accusations – even before Grassley asked him.

So why won’t his accuser?

And why, pray tell, are the Democrats on the committee not cooperating with Senator Grassley?

This is, as the saying goes, something that makes you go “Hmmmm.”

Now, according to “sources,” Ford’s attorney is the one dragging this along.

If she refuses to appear, hold the vote. https://t.co/X6Hf9D0GKx

— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 18, 2018

Perhaps Ford or her attorney will finally respond to Grassley’s repeated requests. It still could happen.

But if I had to venture a guess, I’d say the reason Ford is dragging her feet is because they want to do everything humanly possible to delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Nothing happens by mistake.

And the Democrats’ talking points are clear.

"We deserve the TRUTH!!! … only, just not right this minute." https://t.co/RHPPmcvIEJ

— Dianny 🇺🇸 (@DiannyRants) September 17, 2018

Since July the Democrats have been demanding that Kavanaugh’s confirmation be delayed until after the Midterm elections.

You don’t think they’re going to exploit the hell out of these last-minute accusations to get what they want?

Of course they are.

And since Ford and her attorney are both Leftwing activists in good standing, it stands to reason they would do everything they can to help the Democrats delay this for as long as possible.

They have no intention of having Ford appear.

— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 18, 2018

I’m inclined to agree.

If I were Grassley, I would tell Ford and her attorney that it’s Monday or never. And if they don’t agree, screw them and screw the Democrats.

Proceed with the vote and confirm Kavanaugh.

—

Hit the Tip Jar!

Every dollar makes a difference! Hit the DONATE button in the side bar. Or, set up a recurring monthly contribution by choosing SUBSCRIBE. If you cannot afford to contribute, please whitelist PatriotRetort.com in your ad-blocker. Ads help pay for this site. And, as a promise to you, the ads are not obnoxious or overbearing and will never interfere with your enjoyment of PatriotRetort.com.