Waterboarding?! Pfft! Listening to Kamala Harris? Now that’s torture.


The Senate Democrats’ inquisition of Gina Haspel has begun.

And I plan to lodge a formal complaint with the Hague.

No one should be subjected to the cruel and inhumane torture of listening to Kamala Harris give a lecture on morality.

It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so agonizingly painful.

Kamala’s preening sanctimony is like a hot poker up your back door.

Listening to her would make terrorists beg to be waterboarded. If for no other reason than the soaking wet towel over their head would muffle the sound of her sanctimonious twaddle.

And to watch this abortion advocate babble about what is and is not immoral?

That’s not just torture; it’s astonishingly lacking in self-awareness.

Sure, jamming a needle into the back of an unborn baby’s skull then sucking the little one out with a hose doesn’t bother Kamala one bit.

But waterboarding a terrorist?

That’s immoral!!!

You should have asked her a fifth time, Kamala.

Trust me, having to listen to you is torture enough. After a fifth time, she would’ve sung like a canary.

Ah, well. Hindsight.

The truth is, Kamala Harris and her fellow virtue-signaling Democrats don’t give a damn about waterboarding. None of them would vote to confirm Haspel even if she broke down and begged for forgiveness for the CIA waterboarding terrorists over ten years ago.

No. The kvetching about so-called torture is all a show.

They know full well that enhanced interrogation techniques used by the CIA in the past are nothing compared to the brutal and barbaric methods used by the enemy.

You know, what we on Planet Earth call actual torture.

Let me tell you what they’re trying to set up here.

It’s a Midterm election year. And the Democrats’ so-called Blue Wave has been reduced to nothing more than a dribble – like a ribbon of drool seeping out of the side of Maxine Water’s mouth.

So these guys think by lighting their hair on fire and looking noble over so-called torture will have the same results for them in 2018 that it did in 2006.

It won’t.

But don’t tell Kamala that. She might stop talking.

Sure, listening to her is torture. But the more she talks, the more Americans hate her. And the smaller that “Blue Wave” becomes.

Hit the Tip Jar!

Every dollar makes a difference! Hit the DONATE button in the side bar. Or, set up a recurring monthly contribution by choosing SUBSCRIBE. If you cannot afford to contribute, please whitelist PatriotRetort.com in your ad-blocker. Ads help pay for this site. And, as a promise to you, the ads are not obnoxious or overbearing and will never interfere with your enjoyment of PatriotRetort.com.

5 thoughts on “Waterboarding?! Pfft! Listening to Kamala Harris? Now that’s torture.

  • May 10, 2018 at 9:10 am

    The feigned ‘Indignation’ that the minority members of the committee display is the repetition of the mantra as instructed by the party leaders. Kamala can talk and talk and literally say nothing we did not hear since 2006 on. The democrat playbook is

    1) Always criticize the other party.
    2) Rinse, repeat.
    3) Never accept responsibility for your party’s failures.
    4) Rinse repeat.

    Had Clinton appointee Jamie Gorelick not imposed a ‘wall’ against sharing intel between our foreign and domestic intelligence agencies it is likely the attacks of 9-11 would never had happened.
    If you are looking for the genesis of the entire issue of Gitmo and interrogation there it is.
    Thanks Dem’s.

  • May 10, 2018 at 12:11 pm

    Morality? Morality? She has the morality of the Marquis de Sade as a proponent of extreme freedom, unrestrained by morality, religion, or law. A champion of sodomite marriage, climate change, reducing jail population, reducing criminal penalties for crimes such as drug dealing, elimination of the death penalty, illegal alien rights, dropping the f-bomb in every other word, harassing witnesses at hearings etc.

    This marxist minx failed her bar exam on the first try. She’s slept her way to political power. When she was a recent law school 29 year old grad, working in a low level position in the SF City Attorney’s office, she had a public affair with 60 yr. old, married, CA political kingmaker, ex speaker of the assembly, Willie (the bagman) Brown, she’s a trophy girlfriend— and like her role model Pelosi still willing to work her side of the street.

  • May 10, 2018 at 2:07 pm

    Living in the Bay Area I’ve watched Harris move up the ladder. Years ago I wrote on my own blog that the 2 upcoming prog stars to watch out for is Harris and Gavin Newsom, soon to be governor of my crap state. Newsom is smarter than Harris but lacks the proper skin pigment and double X chromosomes to get fast tracked within the identity politics party.

    Yesterday I wrote a short post on the hearings;


    I expect her to get confirmed, she will be great at the job.

  • May 10, 2018 at 2:40 pm

    i think it’s hilarious to listen to the most immoral people in the country question other people about their morality. Like Al Franken questioning Neil Gorsuch

  • May 10, 2018 at 4:28 pm

    An infamous political dynasty has been sub rosa backing her for 17 months!
    1. 1 of them openly backed Clinton Summer ’15. The rest openly said vote Clinton 10/16.
    2. the 2 who were Presidents share the same 1st name.
    3. Far left GOPe

    If you give up the answer will be posted fri afternoon West time.

Comments are closed.