Why is DiFi colluding with the Iranian Foreign Minister?

Why is DiFi colluding with the Iranian Foreign Minister

You’d think stupidly employing a Chinese spy for decades would have made Dianne more cautious.

But no.

Yesterday, DiFi was spotted on Capitol Hill on her personal iPhone making a call to Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.

Really?  Can someone tell me when DiFi became Secretary of State?  Is she the Trump Administration’s personal envoy to Iran?

I mean, for Pete’s sake, Mike Flynn’s life has been turned upside down for speaking on the phone with the Russian Ambassador when he was incoming National Security Advisor.

So what in the name of sweet, fancy Moses is DiFi doing chatting up the Iranian Foreign Minister?

Mike Flynn was well within his authority when he spoke with the Russian Ambassador.  But by what authority is DiFi speaking to Javad Zarif?

After Politico reporter Jake Sherman asked Feinstein’s chief of staff about DiFi speaking with Zarif, her office released this statement:

“War isn’t necessary to solve a problem when both sides want a solution. I urge Secretary Pompeo to reach out to Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, who I know doesn’t want to see a conflict with the United States.”

Of course she knows. She’s secretly communicating with the Iranian Foreign Minister behind the backs of the State Department and the President.

So, is DiFi the Senator from California, or is she Javad Zarif’s personal emissary?

Is this not collusion?

On his show last night, Mark Levin made this comparison:

“Can you imagine? It’d be like WWII: You have FDR, and then you have senators contacting the Third Reich!”

I wouldn’t have known about this if not for someone on Twitter retweeting Jake Sherman’s tweet about it.

In fact, I just did a Duck-Duck-Go search and the only two reports that popped up are the item from Politico and the Conservative Review post about Mark Levin’s comments.

That’s it.  Nothing from CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, the Washington Post, the New York Times – not one report.

Those guys tripped all over themselves to break the news that the incoming National Security Advisor spoke with the Russian Ambassador (something NatSec Advisors are supposed to do).

But a sitting United States Senator is bypassing diplomatic channels and speaking directly with the Iranian Foreign Minister on her freaking personal iPhone and nobody in the news media gives two craps.

Why should Javad Zarif bother communicating with Secretary of State Pompeo or President Trump when he knows he can count on John Kerry and DiFi to advocate for Iran’s interests?

The fact that DiFi running interference for Iran isn’t making the news is yet one more example of how phony the whole Russian Collusion narrative is.

Because if the media really had a problem with Americans colluding with enemy states, DiFi and her collusion with the Iranian Foreign Minister would be front page news.

Hit the Tip Jar!

Every dollar makes a difference!  Hit the DONATE button in the side bar.  Or, set up a recurring monthly contribution by choosing SUBSCRIBE.

Please White List Patriot Retort

Not everyone can afford to make a donation.  But you can still help keep this site solvent by white listing PatriotRetort.com in your ad blocker. Ads help pay for this site and ad-blockers hurt that effort.  I made sure that the ads that appear here will not obstruct or interfere with your enjoyment of the content.  So please add PatriotRetort.com to your white list.

3 thoughts on “Why is DiFi colluding with the Iranian Foreign Minister?

  • May 17, 2019 at 9:55 am
    Permalink

    Of course Iran doesn’t want a conflict with the US. They are cowards who prefer to convince mentally-handicapped children into committing acts of terrorism against their perceived enemies.

    Regardless, DiFi needs to be removed from office. The list of valid arguments for doing so is much too long to list here.

  • May 17, 2019 at 12:59 pm
    Permalink

    Her Chinese chauffeur, Yu Fon Nao, made her do it.

  • May 17, 2019 at 2:52 pm
    Permalink

    Seriously, DiFi is making the case for a review of sedition law and the Logan Act.
    And what’s with Dems telling the Chinese to hang in there, Trump will be gone soon?

Comments are closed.