This could be another case of “Be careful what you wish for”

Democrats and the Enslaved Press may want to think long and hard about pushing the Trump Administration on the President’s claim that Obama spied on him.

Much like Russiagate, this may be yet another case of “Be careful what you wish for.”

The reason Barack Obama avoided getting ensnared in a scandal for eight years isn’t because he didn’t do anything worthy of a scandal.

Not at all. It’s because the Enslaved Press and the Democrats in Congress shielded him from scrutiny.

It’s hard to find scandals when you’re too busy covering them up.

And they did everything they could to keep the American people in the dark over what Barack Obama was up to.

But Obama isn’t the one in charge of the Justice Department or the White House anymore.

And by demanding that the White House back up the President’s claims about Obama, they are inviting exposure of something that may very well prove Trump’s accusations.

If there’s one thing I’ve learned about Donald Trump over the last couple of years, it’s that 99% of the time when he says something, eventually he gets proven right.

Is that really something the Democrats and Enslaved Press want in the particular case?

So be careful what you wish for, Democrats. Because you just might get it.

This morning on Fox & Friends, Judge Andrew Napolitano made one hell of a claim.

“Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command. He didn’t use the NSA; he didn’t use the CIA; he didn’t use the FBI. And he didn’t use Department of Justice. He used GCHQ. What the heck is GCHQ? That’s the initials for the British spying agency. They have 24/7 access to the NSA database. So by simply having two people go to them saying, ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump, conversations involving president-elect Trump,’ he’s able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this.”

If this report is true, the Democrat Party is screwed six ways from Sunday.

Demanding that President Trump prove that Obama was keeping tabs on him may very well result in us learning that Obama was keeping tabs on him.

And not in a legal way.

You’d think by now they would learn that shrieking, “Prove it!” to Donald Trump will only end badly for them.

But they fall for it every single time.

Hat tip Breitbart.

Hit the tip jar!

Please consider making a contribution to Hit DONATE button in the side bar. Even a few bucks can make a world of difference!

4 thoughts on “This could be another case of “Be careful what you wish for”

  • March 14, 2017 at 3:06 pm

    Ya know…I can’t even stand to Look at that Freakin’ Loser, O-Dumb-a. I get nauseated and gut wrenched just looking at a Title with his Ugly Lying face on it!
    Can’t he just freakin’ go Away?

  • March 15, 2017 at 8:46 am

    Reminds me of the time our President insinuated that there may have been voter fraud.
    The Commie Left was all “HaHa!…Well, why don’t you appoint a special investigation to look into it, smart guy?”
    Our President simply said,”Ya know, I think I’ll appoint a special investigation to look into it.”

    Uh-oh. NEVER MIND.

    (I truly hate these shitbirds, too Dianny.)

Comments are closed.