Answering a hypothetical question is not illegal

Answering a hypothetical question is not illegal

Well the Faux Outrage Mob is back at it today because yesterday, President Trump answered a hypothetical question posed to him by George Stephanopoulos.

In regard to the upcoming 2020 election, Stephanopoulos asked Trump if he would take information offered from a foreign actor about an opponent or if he would alert the FBI.

President Trump answered, “I think maybe you do both. I think you might want to listen. There’s nothing wrong with listening.”

Now, leaving aside that it is not illegal to talk to foreigners, this was a hypothetical question to which President Trump gave a hypothetical answer.

And yet, the Outrage Mob is setting its hair on fire screaming that Trump is saying he’s going to accept foreign help to win the election!!!!

My God. This man is such a criminal!!!! How is he still PRESIDENT!!!! Reeeeeeeeeee!!!!!

He answered a freaking hypothetical question.

And Outrage Mob aside, answering a hypothetical question is not illegal.

Let me ask you a hypothetical question.

If you found out that your child was being sexually molested by someone, would you A) beat the living shit out of the guy or B) call the police?

Now, according to the Outrage Mob, every single one of you who said in this hypothetical you’d beat the living shit out of him (and even those of you who said you’d do both) are criminals and must be locked up.

It doesn’t matter that this is a hypothetical. Just admitting you would consider beating the crap out of the pedophile is enough to put you away according to the nitwits on cable news and in Hollywood.

Only, of course, it’s not.  Because answering a hypothetical question isn’t illegal.

I admit my analogy is not completely in line.

Because, as I said earlier, talking to a “foreign actor” is not illegal whereas I’m guessing hunting down a predator and beating the crap out of him probably is.

But I think you get the point.

Back when the Covington kids were being dragged through the social media square, I gave you this helpful tip: Never fall for the Social Media Outrage Mob.

Trust me.  Those are words to live by in this day and age.

Here’s a little inside baseball for you.  The media talking heads and Democrat politicians who are well-I-nevering over Trump’s answer to this hypothetical question? They really aren’t outraged at all.

Their outrage is like a rip tide.  The purpose is to drag unsuspecting people out away from reality and into the tumultuous deep waters of delusion.

They’ve been doing this for four friggin’ years.

“OMG!!! Trump called all Mexicans rapists!!!!!!”

(Only he didn’t)

“OMG!!!! Trump called immigrants animals!!!!!!!”

(Only he didn’t)

“OMG!!! Trump told the Russians to hack Hillary’s emails!!!!”

(Only he didn’t)

You get the idea.

The purpose of the latest outrage is twofold:

First, to stir up hysteria among the uninformed and thereby keep Trump Derangement on the front burner of the news cycle.

And second, to continue pushing the Russian collusion hoax that Mueller completely shut down.

The fact is, if using foreign “actors” (let’s stick with Georgie’s term) to get oppo research was actually illegal, Hillary Clinton and the DNC would be in some serious legal trouble right now.

See, Hillary and the DNC didn’t just talk about doing it hypothetically. They actually did it.

The Clinton campaign got a “foreign actor” (AKA Christopher Steele, a Brit) to gather oppo research on Trump by milking his connections within the Russian government.

In addition to that, the Clinton campaign and the DNC were in contact with the Ukrainian government to try and undermine Donald Trump’s candidacy.

In other words, all of this foaming at the mouth hysteria and outrage is utter BS and the people pushing it know it.

Sure, the ResistanceLOL will lap it up like a big dumb dog – as it does every time the faux Outrage Mob kicks into gear.

But it’s nonsense.

Instead of arguing — instead of getting pissed off — I choose to be amused by this.

If President Trump was really going down — if the walls were really closing in — the faux Outrage Mob wouldn’t need to gin up phony hysteria over nothing.

And trust me. This is nothing. It’s air in a jug.

These guys have thrown everything they can cook up at Donald Trump and it slides off of him like he’s been Scotch-Guarded.

So why waste your time and energy getting caught up in the rip tide?

Hit the Tip Jar!

Every dollar makes a difference!  Hit the DONATE button in the side bar.  Or, set up a recurring monthly contribution by choosing SUBSCRIBE.

Please White List Patriot Retort

Not everyone can afford to make a donation.  But you can still help keep this site solvent by white listing in your ad blocker. Ads help pay for this site and ad-blockers hurt that effort.  I made sure that the ads that appear here will not obstruct or interfere with your enjoyment of the content.  So please add to your white list.

Share, share, share

5 thoughts on “Answering a hypothetical question is not illegal

  • June 13, 2019 at 2:33 pm

    A friend asked why “nothing sticks to Trump.” I paraphrased a Bill Whittle truism: If you’re at a wedding and you throw mud at a beautiful bride all in white, it’s devastating. Do the same thing at someone walking away from a mud wrestling match and you don’t even notice. Trump’s had so much phony garbage hurled at him that at this point, any more attacks make no difference at all.

  • June 13, 2019 at 2:39 pm

    1. Reagan was called a teflon president. Trump is truly teflon… he doesn’t let that crap bother him. He usually uses it to his advantage in some way.

    2. If someone sexually molested one of my kids when they were growing up I definitely would have beat the shit out of them… no hypothetical.

  • June 13, 2019 at 7:16 pm

    one side note: if President Trump would have said yes you should, Georgie Boy was ready to pivot to the Trump Tower meeting and Don Jr. And you know Trump saw that coming.

    Also telling Georgie Boy “you know, that’s called oppo research” to Slick Willy’s oppo research prince was a very distinct pow, right in the kisser to Georgie Boy – and they both knew it. Comic gold.

  • June 13, 2019 at 7:25 pm

    Anyone catch that sickening Juan Williams on The Five today? My God, this guy is really sick. Jesse Watters schooled him beautifully, however.

    Stretch Pelosi and her gang conveniently forget that Hillary actually exchanged money with the Russians, all the money the Clintons exchanged with the Chinese during his administration, what John F’ing Kerry is doing with the Iranians behind the backs of the Trump administration, what Ted Kennedy did with the Russians against Reagan during his re-election campaign, what the Obama did with the enemies of Bibi N. in Israel, and on and on and on.

    These low lifes are truly disgusting.

    (BTW, I do not understand why Little Georgie was allowed in the White House. And why was this Clinton kiss-up standing so close to the President? )

  • June 14, 2019 at 8:52 am

    This reminds me of the Obama folks bringing McStain’s eligibility up due to him not being born on US soil. By the time the talking heads finished running it into the ground, people were fatigued over the conversation when the subject again came up about the Kenyan.

    They know Bill Bar is investigating the Fainting Felon for this very thing, so what better way to make the low information voters not care at all than project it on POTUS, play it 24/7 until everyone is bored with the subject, and when the actual evidence of D’s doing these very things come with indictments, they get away with moral relativism in the public square.

Comments are closed.