In Terms of Kamala Redux

In Terms of Kamala Redux

It’s been a while since I’ve checked to see if Kamala Harris was still at it, in terms of Kamala using her favorite phrase. So I thought now might be a good time to run an update.

And in terms of Kamala and her extemporaneous speaking, Kamala is still loading up her clumsy word salads with “in terms of.”

On Friday, Kamala was in Pittsburgh to talk about “investments” to replace lead pipes. And before the “conversation” on “investments” began, she delivered a brief 324-word opening statement. And in those 324-words, Kamala used her favorite phrase five times.

In this case, in terms of Kamala, it’s better to have the visual:

In terms of Kamala Pittsburgh

Even in terms of Kamala, that’s a lot of “in terms of” for remarks that brief.

And then there was Kamala’s actual address in Pittsburgh. Throughout her speech, Kamala used her favorite phrase six times, with half of them coming in the same paragraph:

“And so, again, that highlights the importance of what’s happening here in Pittsburgh, which it is not only about addressing the issue IN TERMS OF amelioration and mitigation, but addressing the issue IN TERMS OF doing the first step, which is public education about the seriousness of the issue and the need, then, to address the harm that the issue creates.  And to do that, what we must do as government and together, collectively, to allow homeowners to become aware if their paint contains lead or their pipes are flowing with lead, IN TERMS OF the water that then goes into their home.”

Read that out loud to yourself. Even leaving aside the repeated use of “in terms of,” this is incomprehensible gibberish.

“to allow homeowners to become aware.” Is somebody trying to prevent homeowners from becoming aware? Do homeowners really need the government to “allow them to become aware?”

But the first part made me laugh out loud. Not only does Kamala use her favorite phrase twice in the first sentence, she uses another phrase four times in that same sentence:

“which it is not only about addressing THE ISSUE in terms of amelioration and mitigation, but addressing THE ISSUE in terms of doing the first step, which is public education about the seriousness of THE ISSUE and the need, then, to address the harm that THE ISSUE creates.”

Sweet merciful Zeus. This woman is repetitive and redundant.

That’s a verbal tic Kamala has suffered from for years, as I pointed out in my 2019 column “Word Salad Kamala.”

As I have said before, in terms of Kamala and her issue, in terms of public speaking, every time she opens her mouth, she sounds like a fourth-grader giving an oral book report on a book she didn’t read.

And this isn’t an issue that is going to improve in terms of the passage of time. No matter how significant the passage of time may be.

Hit the Tip Jar!

Every dollar makes a difference!  Hit the DONATE button in the sidebar.  Or, set up a recurring monthly contribution by choosing SUBSCRIBE.

Books by Dianny

Check out Dianny’s collection of ebooks available at all of these fine stores: Amazon Kindle Store, Apple iBooks, Barnes & Noble Nook Store, and smashwords.com.

Share, share, share

3 thoughts on “In Terms of Kamala Redux

  • June 18, 2022 at 9:09 am
    Permalink

    I dunno, Dianny… She might be a better (unelected) President. Lunch bucket Joe couldn’t say “amelioration” if he had a few dozen 11-year old Prell girls to coach him through it.

    Reply
  • June 18, 2022 at 7:30 pm
    Permalink

    She used that term “ex-po-dent-ially.” Ain’t that right, Joe? 🤣

    Reply
  • June 19, 2022 at 1:08 am
    Permalink

    In terms of the damage she (or her regime) , I fear what she can do.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.