This is about taking sides

I’ve been saying for quite a while that Barack Obama’s moony-eyed infatuation with the mullahs was less about halting “nuclear proliferation” in the Middle East and more about shifting the balance of power.

Which may explain why Iran’s Arab neighbors aren’t so happy about this “deal” Obama ramrodded through.

Personally, I think it is deeply naïve to think for a moment that Barack Obama’s objective has been to bring about a “more hopeful, more helpful world.”

This is about taking sides.

Obama has very strong ties to Iran and Iranian-backed terror organizations going back to well before his days in the White House.

He’s a fan-boy.

Not just him. Valerie Jarrett is a big mullah-supporting fan girl.

Obama wants Iran to gain hegemony over the Middle East.

It’s really the primary reason he isn’t do very much to stop ISIS. You see, if the US won’t step in, Iraq will look to Iran for help.

And this is precisely what Barack wants.

This has never been about stopping Iran.


And it most emphatically has nothing to do with preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

Let’s be frank here.

If Obama really wanted to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, why in the world would he include in this “deal” training Iran in how to detect and prevent any attacks on their nuclear program?

From the Free Beacon:

This will include “training courses and workshops to strengthen Iran’s ability to prevent, protect and respond to nuclear security threats to nuclear facilities and systems as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems,” according to the text.
Additional “training and workshops” would work to “strengthen Iran’s ability to protect against, and respond to nuclear security threats, including sabotage, as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems,” the text states.
The language was viewed as disturbing by analysts and experts who said such cooperation could help protect Iran against efforts by the Israelis or other countries to sabotage the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program in the future.

Take a moment to digest that.

This “deal” which is supposed to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons includes training to help Iran protect against anyone attempting to sabotage their nuclear program when the inevitable happens and Iran violates this “deal.”

That’s because Obama has no expectation that this “deal” do anything but open the door for Iran’s domination of the Middle East.

This is about taking sides, you guys.

Iran over Saudi Arabia.

Iran over US Arab allies.

Iran over Israel.

Obama has chosen a side.

And, as we have come to expect from this treasonous piece of garbage in the White House, the side he has chosen is not ours.

On a side note: I apologize that I have not posted much today. As some of you know, I was recently diagnosed with Lupus and on occasion get hit with terrible flare-ups that limit my physical movement. My hands have been terribly afflicted today and yesterday. It makes typing and Photoshopping super hard. Keep a good thought that things will improve.

If you like the work at Patriot Retort, please consider contributing

Hit the tip jar DONATE button in the side bar. Even a few bucks can make a world of difference!

Books by Dianny:

RANT 2.0: Even More Politics & Snark in the Age of Obama,
Liberals Gone WILD!!! The Not-So-Silent Conquering of America,
RANT: Politics & Snark in the Age of Obama,
and two novels: Sliding Home Feet First and Under the Cloud

You can find my e-books at all of these fine, Amazon Kindle Store, Apple iTunes, and Barnes & Noble Nook Store.

Check out — my Conservative & Christian T-shirt Store.

Share, share, share

5 thoughts on “This is about taking sides

  • July 15, 2015 at 1:35 pm

    Don’t apologize. We’ll take whatever posts you can muster. And, yes, good thoughts keep coming your way.

  • July 15, 2015 at 1:57 pm

    Love the posts. Get Well soon.

  • July 15, 2015 at 2:51 pm

    No apologies necessary — get well soon. To paraphrase Anita Bryant, “breakfast without a Dianny Rant is like a day without sunshine.” 🙂
    [Come to think of it, wasn’t AB one of the first targets/victims of the “gay rights” movement back in the 1970s?]

    • July 15, 2015 at 3:05 pm

      <3 this. And, yes she was.

  • July 15, 2015 at 11:53 pm

    Best wishes. Love your “Trash”

Comments are closed.